Thursday, Apr 04, 2024
Advertisement

Express Investigation: How probe pivots on political flip-flops in the case of Ajit Pawar

In November 2019, as the two agencies continued their probe, questioning suspects, the Shiv Sena left the NDA and formed the MVA government with Congress and NCP. In October 2020, with Ajit Pawar part of the government now, the EOW filed a closure report in the case.

ajit pawarCitizens in Baramati give a grand welcome to Ajit Pawar on August 26, 2023 after he becomes deputy chief minister for the fifth time (Express Photo by Pavan Khengre)

Nothing better illustrates the striking parallels between action against politicians by central investigative agencies and changing political equations in a state than the case of Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar in Maharashtra.

In August 2019, following an order of the Bombay High Court, the Mumbai Economic Offences Wing (EOW) registered an FIR against Pawar and 70 others in connection with alleged irregularities in the running of Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank. Pawar was the bank’s director at the time of the alleged offence. The FIR also named other politicians from NCP, Congress and Shiv Sena.

Based on this FIR, the ED registered an Enforcement Case Information Report (equivalent to an FIR) in September 2019. The report also listed the names of NCP supremo Sharad Pawar; Congress leaders Jayant Patil, Diliprao Deshmukh and (the late) Madan Patil; NCP’s Ishwarlal Jain and Shivaji Rao Nalawade; and Shiv Sena’s Anandrao Adsul.

Advertisement

In November 2019, as the two agencies continued their probe, questioning suspects, the Shiv Sena left the NDA and formed the MVA government with Congress and NCP. In October 2020, with Ajit Pawar part of the government now, the EOW filed a closure report in the case.

The ED, however, challenged this closure report in court through an intervention application arguing there was evidence that needs to be investigated. But its challenge was rejected on the ground that it had no locus standi to interfere in the Mumbai EOW probe. In fact, the EOW argued that ED was taking “undue interest” in the case.

Festive offer

From the ED’s point of view, its case against Ajit Pawar would become infructuous if the Mumbai EOW closed its FIR because it cannot probe a money laundering case without a predicate offence — a pre-existing FIR of financial fraud or corruption by another agency. In this case, it had even attached assets to the tune of Rs 65 crore earlier, in July 2021.

Eventually, in April 2022, the ED filed a prosecution complaint (equivalent to a chargesheet) naming a clutch of companies. A month later, Eknath Shinde and about 40 other MLAs walked out of the Shiv Sena and formed a government with the BJP, bringing an end to the MVA rule.

Advertisement

Three months later, in October 2022, the Mumbai EOW again went to court, now with a plea to reopen the case against Ajit Pawar and make further investigations based on evidence, it said, was found by ED.

But then came another political twist.

A year later, in July 2023, Ajit Pawar split the NCP and joined the NDA with seven other party leaders including Praful Patel and Chhagan Bhujbal. He later took oath as Deputy CM.

In September 2023, the ED filed two supplementary chargesheets in the case where it named the Sharad Pawar-led NCP faction’s MLA Prajakt Tanpure among other politicians, including a former MLA from the Eknath Shinde camp. It did not name Ajit Pawar.

Following this, in January 2024, the Mumbai EOW approached the court saying further investigation had not found any evidence and filed a second closure report in the case. The ED has since approached court with another intervention application.

First uploaded on: 03-04-2024 at 07:00 IST
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close